Most Employers Not Cutting Benefits
Some employees are worried, though, that employers might cut back their benefits offerings or coverage levels. One-third of workers are concerned that employers will reduce workplace benefits over the next 12 months.
But fewer than 15 percent of employers expect to make such cuts. This even holds true for small employers (those with less than 500 employees), of which only 14 percent plan to reduce employee benefits offerings in some manner as a result of unfavorable economic conditions.
One explanation for their reticence: 39 percent of employers (and 50 percent of employers with 2,500 or more employees) believe that workplace morale is linked strongly to the quality of employee benefits.
Half of large employers believe thatworker morale is linked strongly tothe quality of employee benefits.
“With employees expressing an increased appreciation of workplace benefits, employers have a great opportunity to maximize the inherent value of their benefits programs for their people — and their bottom line,” said Bill Mullaney, president of MetLife Institutional Business, speaking at MetLife’s 5th National Benefits Symposium in Washington, D.C., on March 23, 2009. “It’s great to see that most employers are focused on long-term objectives for continued sustainability and are thoughtfully considering how to react to current economic pressures,” he remarked.
Near-Term Optimism, Long-Term Concern
Interestingly, even though 45 percent of employees say they live paycheck to paycheck (up from 37 percent in 2006), about four in 10 (43 percent) believe that their economic situation will improve over the next six months, whereas only 20 percent believe that it will worsen. Generation Y employees, born between 1977 and 1987, are most confident, with 56 percent expecting their financial situation to improve by mid-2009.
Longer term, however, MetLife found that employees worry about their ability to afford a comfortable retirement. That’s in keeping with another recent survey, the first quarter 2009 Principal Financial Well-Being Index, which showed that most U.S. employees were very concerned about their long-term financial well-being — 74 percent, up from 67 percent in the first quarter of 2008.
In MetLife’s survey, slightly more than half (51 percent) of U.S. workers are planning to retire later than they were expecting 12 months earlier. (Among employees older than 60, a recent CareerBuilder survey also found a high number planning to stay on the job longer.
The most nagging retirement-related concerns, MetLife found, were:
• Being able to afford health care in retirement (cited by 65 percent of employees).
• Outliving retirement money (61 percent).
• Providing for a spouse’s long-term-care needs (also 61 percent).
The need to pay for day-to-day expenses is the No. 1 reason standing in the way of an earlier retirement, with 60 percent of pre-retirees ages 51 to 60, and even 43 percent of those ages 61 to 69, noting that they depend on their paychecks for routine living expenses. Furthermore, five in 10 workers report staying in the workplace because they rely on their salary to save for retirement (48 percent) or to maintain access to benefits (47 percent).
Opportunity for Employers
More than half (51 percent) of employees are very interested in having their employer provide access to financial planners for help in making retirement decisions, such as investing in a 401(k), up from 38 percent in 2006, MetLife found.